[PDF / Epub] ☉ The Science of God By Gerald Schroeder – Motyourdrive.co.uk

The Science of God files The Science of God, read online The Science of God, free The Science of God, free The Science of God, The Science of God 6c226c309 Popular Ebook, The Science Of God By Gerald Schroeder This Is Very Good And Becomes The Main Topic To Read, The Readers Are Very Takjup And Always Take Inspiration From The Contents Of The Book The Science Of God, Essay By Gerald Schroeder Is Now On Our Website And You Can Download It By Register What Are You Waiting For Please Read And Make A Refission For You


10 thoughts on “The Science of God

  1. says:

    Let me start here I am a Christian I love science I do not see how these things do not go together, and why there is so much argument about being content with scientific explanations and simultaneously loving God If you fall into that boat, or if you are agnostic, atheist, or another religion curious about Christianity, you will enjoy this book If you are a Christian that cannot stand to read anything about evolution, the Earth being older than 10K years, and well science, then you won t like this book.Schroeder does an amazing job as he weds science and God in a big embracing sigh of amazement He is a physicist, and breaks things down in a complicated but not overly complicated fashion The book raises questions about things all around us, and goes to science and the bible to elaborate on these things This book helped me to answer, and to accept my curiosity of wanting to seek answers, to the questions I ve had for years It opened up my eyes to patterns in nature, and to the infinite detail of God s glory My words fail in doing this book justice.


  2. says:

    This is a book that actually compares physical science with biblical teachings I read this a long time ago and have since evolved in my spiritual mentality, but this was the first book that I read on my journey to the place I am now It enlightened me by speaking to sense of reality as opposed to trying to relay hard to understand and sometimes accept spiritual conceptions Even those that are waivering between belief in a Creator or not will have hard time disputing some of the solid arguments IN FAVOR of the idea that there must be a Creator This was another book that you cannot just flip pages and get the idea It takes some concentration as the material is scientifically based.


  3. says:

    In The Science of God, Gerald Schroeder takes on a tremendously difficult task he attempts to reconcile his modern scientific knowledge with his traditional religious beliefs One would be hard pressed to argue he doesn t know his science considering he earned a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology In an unusual scholarly combination, Schroeder is also well versed in the Torah and the Jewish religious tradition He has clearly spent a lifetime studying and analyzing the specific wording of the Old Testament in the original Hebrew This solid grounding in both fields puts Schroeder in a very rare position indeed He is able to comprehend and fully grapple with the issues in a way that scientists who haven t studied the Torah or religious people who haven t studied the science can t Anyone with the slightest bit of intellectual curiosity or who has ever asked the Big Questions will be fascinated by the subjects Schroeder covers For this reason, whether convinced by his arguments or not, one should read the book Additionally, Schroeder has an uncanny ability to simplify complex subject matter for the layperson This accomplishment is particularly impressive considering the topics covered are not at all intuitive or readily accessible For example, Schroeder covers Einstein s relativity, the nature of an omnipotent God, the mechanics of DNA, statistical probabilities of certain mutations occuring, the origin of mankind, quantum mechanics and its relation to free will, the limits of human knowledge, and unknown and potentially unobservable dimensions Schroeder s thesis is that much of the perceived difference between ancient biblical teachings and modern science stems from misconceptions held by advocates on both sides His approach is to explain the agreed upon modern science, identify any misconceptions held about the science or the religion, and then explain how the Jewish interpretation of the Torah matches the science His sources for the Jewish interpretation of the Torah are Maimonides, a 12th century Rabbi Nahmanides, a 13th century Kabbalist, philosopher, and biblical commentator and the Torah, itself He intentionally selects Jewish commentators writing before the modern scientific discoveries so that they cannot be accused of chicanery such as altering their interpretation of the Torah to fit the modern scientific findings.As recently as the early 1960 s, two thirds of the leading U.S scientists believed in an eternal or steady state universe Einstein even claimed to have proven it, though via a bit of fudging with a cosmological constant Eventually, mounting evidence from cosmic background radiation and other sources could not be denied The debate ended with scientists catching up to what Genesis claimed all along there was a beginning Schroeder reconciles the 7 days creation claim with the billions of years through Einstein s theory of relativity The faster one moves, the slower time passes relative to another person who is stationary Schroeder says that both billions of years passed and mere days passed depending on whose perspective one takes Earth time moves at a different pace than the time that would be observed at another location in the universe.Skeptics once claimed that determinism as put forth by Marquis Pierre Simon de Laplace in the 18th century, the theory that all choices are predetermined by physics and chemistry, left no room for free will If we re all automatons without free will, what room is there for good and evil Schroeder reveals the death of determinism through a discussion of quantum mechanics and Heisenberg s uncertainty principle, which defines the limit to the precision by which the position and momentum mass times velocity of any particle could be measured Matter and physics, it turns out, have many possible alternative paths until one is determined through observation But the observation itself changes the process, meaning that any given outcome is not predetermined If those convinced against their will are of the same opinion still, then the skeptics can easily rationalize away a God by referring to some events as insufficiently caused The Torah calls these events miracles.The limits of human knowledge are indeed humbling Schroeder explains that an opaque plate placed infront of a screen to capture light reveals as yet unexplained laws of nature When a thin slit is made in the opaque piece of glass, a fuzzy band of light will shine through onto the screen However, when two slits are made parallel to one another, there are not two fuzzy, equal sized bands Instead, there are a series of alternating light and dark bands The dark bands have no light because the wavelike nature of light cancels itself out The trough of one wave combined with the crest of another causes both to disappear However, even if you use a maser gun to shoot one atom or one photon of light at a time with an hour between each shot, the same dark bands appear when both slits are open Meanwhile a different, fuzzy pattern appears when only one band is open Why does another open slit elsewhere impact the single atom or photon going through the first slit The atom can only go through one slit or the other, yet it is somehow impacted by the other slit being open Also, simply observing which slit the photon goes through changes the pattern too It reverts back to the fuzzy bands if a particle monitor is set next to one of the slits Not only that, but nothing is thought to travel faster than light There isn t time for the light to check to see if the other slit is open and return with this information to the photon traveling through the first slit This was my first exposure to the double slit experiment, and I found it to be one of the most interesting parts of the book For information see double slit experiment leads Schroeder and other physicists to speculate that there are alternate dimensions that humans can t observe The idea is that the atoms or photons are traveling through some passage that we don t know about, some warp or rift in the space time continuum He uses the analogy of people confined to the circumference of a circle Assume they can only move forward and backward around the circle with no knowledge of moving left or right or up and down If another person, not confined to the circumference traveled across the diameter, the confined people would not understand how he traveled so quickly Schroeder says we are confined to our 4 dimensions, but he speculates that nature or God operates in potentially 26 dimensions.Schroeder mentions the Cambrian explosion, when viewed in combination with the improbability of independently evolved organs such as eyes, as evidence that evolution is directed or guided If nothing else, we must acknowledge that evolution does not occur gradually over very long periods of time When Darwin wrote, natura non facit saltum, he would have been accurate to write, natura sola facit saltum That is, the claim that nature does not make sudden jumps is contradicted by the evidence The data reveal that nature only makes sudden jumps Schroeder theorizes that the information necessary for alternate body shapes or organs is stored in the latent library of DNA.In the end, I am disappointed in myself for not having the background or ability to critically analyze the scientific or biblical claims made Nonetheless, the clarity of the writing combined with the methodical presentation of the material make for a plausible if not compelling case Moreover, Schroeder does not explicitly argue that there is a God He is a believer and he specifically believes in the Jewish God of the Old Testament, but he goes out of his way to restate that his arguments are not offered as proof of God For example, on page 22 he says, While a beginning does not confirm the existence of a Beginner, it does open the way for that possibility His intent in this book is to simply remove perceived differences between science and religion and open up the dialogue That he refuses to make the stronger claim God certainly does exist is evidence of his thoughtfulness and reserve It s also a refreshing contrast to the cocksure atheists who refuse any possibility of a deity and ignore, manipulate, or downplay contradictory or inconvenient evidence Schroeder s credentials make him an intellectual force to be reckoned with To blithely dismiss him as ignorant, wishful, or misguided would be a grave mistake He makes the arrogance of some other authors, notably Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, much less appealing It s easy to disregard the straw man or distract with humor poked at the absurd It s much difficult to contend with Schroeder s cogent arguments Memorable quotes This is one of those questions they only tell you the answer to when you get your PhD, and they make you promise not to tell anyone John Baez of MIT Convergent evolution by random mutations of the DNA nucleotides becomes statistically so highly improbable as to be functionally impossible For the first time, the scientific community admitted that there was a limit to scientific knowledge Not being able to know the present exactly obviously meant that the future could not be foretold Heisenberg s theory was rapidly developed by such giants of physics as Wolfgang Pauli, Max Born, and particularly Niels Bohr into what became known as the Copenhagen interpretation of the uncertainty principle In essence, they saw the uncertainty principle as leading to a realization that there is no one specific reality in the physical world All the possibilities for existence that fall within the uncertainty of the measurement might actually exist, and only when we make an observation at one specific point do the other possibilities vanish Christopher Marlowe wrote in The Jew of Malta, There is no sin but ignorance Ignorance is the breeding ground of error And error is the source of sin In biblical Hebrew, the generic word for sin is het It means to err, to miss the mark It does not mean to do evil.


  4. says:

    This book is not exactly accessible to those blinded to the truths of science Neither is it accessible to those steeped solely in so called faith in the unseen The Science of God is for the thinker with faith enough to understand and believe that science and God are complimentary in nature rather than polar opposite concepts For anyone seeking truth, this is a must read.


  5. says:

    I want to say he s a hack, but he is unfortunately simply unable to think outside his sphere of spirituality His reasoning is circular and some of what he writes contradicts other comments he makes I am in the process of rebutting this book.


  6. says:

    You should read it Though you may not agree with it I didn t , it is a worthwhile perspective.


  7. says:

    One of the things I love about this book is that Dr Schroeder has his Ph.D from MIT nuclear physics I say this because so many in the atheist community like to push the idea that educated people especially scientists are atheists and that science leads away from faith Clearly it does not and Dr Schroeder proves this.The Science of God is just one of Dr Schroder s books each of which deal with science and theology This particular book is subtitled The convergence of scientific and Biblical wisdom and in it Schroeder looks at issues surrounding among others the following topics The age of the earth The Genesis account of creation Evolution DesignHe even dips his toe into the discussion around Free Will In addressing each of these topics, he gives a thoroughly scientific treatment, showing how faith in God does not require us to abandon scientific rigor In fact, his discussion on the Burgess Shale and the Cambrian Explosion pp 34 37 is worth the purchase price all on its own.For those wondering whether scientists can be believers, the answer is a resounding YES For those who want to deny this, I d just encourage them to pick up this book Schroeder does not sacrifice an ounce of his scientific credibility in defending and arguing for God s existence In fact, he uses it throughout to make his case.Very well written Thoroughly enjoyable And powerful evidence from a leading scientist that the evidence does point to God s existence after all.Highly recommended.


  8. says:

    Schroeder desocnstructs the rift between science and religion, showing how the Bible and current theory compliment each other Most of the conflict, he suggests, is caused by people from one camp failing to have a clear grasp of what the other camp is saying For all his talk of leaving behind preconceived notions he makes a few errors, but for the most part his work is sound Any rational person who thinks religionists are idiots needs to read this book Any religious person who thinks scientist are evil needs to read this book Any person who teaches or is on a school board, anyone who advocates intelligent design, anyone who s had to deal with the problem of evolution or Biblical litteralism in the classroom or the town hall needs to read this book.


  9. says:

    Not at all a good book Schroeder lets science take the lead over Scripture as he attempts to merge Old Earth Creationism, Six Day Creationism, and the Big Bang through the theory of relativity He argues that time is not a constant, so that the six days of creation were six days, but from our perspective, after time increased in speed, as 16 billion years Some interesting things said, but ultimately his view means that Genesis, the foundation of the Bible, would have been completely misunderstood until the theory of relativity was posited Indeed, it would have been impossible to understand until less than fifty years ago All it is doing is causing confusion.


  10. says:

    The author takes to task both Christian fundamentalists and secular fundamentalists for their errors in relation to science A lot of fun but sometimes the quantum physics stuff is over my head.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *