[KINDLE] ❂ Everything Is Broken ❆ Emma Larkin – Motyourdrive.co.uk

Everything Is Broken explained Everything Is Broken , review Everything Is Broken , trailer Everything Is Broken , box office Everything Is Broken , analysis Everything Is Broken , Everything Is Broken 031a Read Emma Larkin S Posts On The Penguin BlogA Deeply Reported Account Of Life Inside Burma In The Months Following The Disastrous Cyclone Nargis And An Analysis Of The Brutal Totalitarian Regime That Clings To Power In The Devastated Nation On May An Enormous Tropical Cyclone Made Landfall In Burma, Wreaking Untold Havoc And Leaving An Official Toll Of , Dead And Missing In The Days That Followed, The Sheer Scale Of The Disaster Became Apparent As Information Began To Seep Out From The Hard Hit Delta Area But The Burmese Regime, In An Unfathomable Decision Of Near Genocidal Proportions, Provided Little Relief To Its Suffering Population And Blocked International Aid From Entering The Country Hundreds Of Thousands Of Burmese Citizens Lacked Food, Drinking Water, And Basic Shelter, But The Xenophobic Generals Who Rule The Country Refused Emergency Help Emma Larkin, Who Has Been Traveling To And Secretly Reporting On Burma For Years, Managed To Arrange For A Tourist Visa In Those Frenzied Days And Arrived Hoping To Help It Was Impossible For Anyone To Gauge Just How Much Devastation The Cyclone Had Left In Its Wake By All Accounts, Including The Regime S, It Was A Catastrophe Of Epic Proportions In Everything Is Broken, Emma Larkin Chronicles The Chaotic Days And Months That Followed The Storm, Revealing The Secretive Politics Of Burma S Military Dictatorship And The Bizarre Combination Of Vicious Military Force, Religion, And Mysticism That Defined Its Unthinkable Response To This Horrific Event The Burmese Regime Hid The Full Extent Of The Storm S Devastation From The Rest Of The World, But The Terrible Consequences For Burma And Its Citizens Continue To Play Out Months After The Headlines Have Faded From Newspapers Around The World In Everything Is Broken, Larkin Whose Deep Knowledge Of The Burmese People Has Afforded Her Unprecedented Access And A Rare Understanding Of Life Under Burmese Oppression Provides A Singular Portrait Of The Regime Responsible For Compounding The Tragedy And Examines The Historical, Religious, And Superstitious Setting That Created Burma S Tenacious And Brutal Dictatorship Writing Under An Assumed Name, Larkin Delivers The Heretofore Untold Story Of A Disaster That Stunned The World, Unveiling As She Does So The Motivations Of The Impenetrable Generals Who Govern This Troubled Nation

  • Hardcover
  • 288 pages
  • Everything Is Broken
  • Emma Larkin
  • English
  • 13 October 2019
  • 9781594202575

About the Author: Emma Larkin

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Everything Is Broken book, this is one of the most wanted Emma Larkin author readers around the world.

10 thoughts on “Everything Is Broken

  1. says:

    Emma Larkin s heart hurts I mean, really hurts About the orphans, and the cyclone, and the dead people everywhere and all that Burma tragedy stuff Sounds like the cyclone was real bad Burma is such a rich case study in how the regime currently in power is forced to constantly make and remake the state and there is genuinely so much she could be talking about but just doesn t How the government has held onto power tightly and without any sign of relenting in the wake of two huge tragedies first the revolt of the Buddhist monks, who effectively declared war on the government and deeply undermined the credibility of the regime, and second the cyclone, which killed untold hundreds of thousands and destroyed livelihoods for so many others Larkin seems limited to just being very upset and jaded about the situation without going any further beyond that Seems like a real waste of her privileged access to the country just after the cyclone.Near the end of the book she hits onto something of a vein of analysis but seems genuinely surprised by her own thought that maybe the Burmese regime kept out foreign aid agencies and governments after the disaster because they wanted to hang on to their sovereignty i mean, look at the history of just about ANY other natural disaster and you ll see the way governments are greatly challenged in the wake of disasters and how many have lost legitimacy afterwards ESPECIALLY when the disaster threatens exactly the mode by which the regime has held power cutting ties between the Burmese people and the rest of the world That s what bugged me the most about this book, how little reflection she does outside of chatting with people at Burmese tea stalls and going into people s makeshift post cyclone houses and asking them EXTREMELY inappropriate questions i.e., how did it feel when you lost everything for the interviews, my impression is that any amount of training or even an awareness of the danger of retraumatization would have greatly changed this book for the better.This book woman is a case study in how when governments work to keep out foreign journalists scholars, they can end up with some really amateur stuff becoming the only work done on certain areas I am tired of people cloaking themselves and their shoddy work in the authenticity of the Global South, not bothering to reflect on the intensely complex identity politics of foreigners undertaking research All Larkin does in this book is get you hot and bothered about the bad bad bad regime in Burma, that s really it There is other scholarship on Burma, including a book I recently enjoyed, A History of Modern Burma.Also avoid the audiobook edition like the plague The reader just might out heart wrench Larkin herself YUCK.

  2. says:

    1 1 wives book club choice for December 2010 This was a very open and explicit look into a country that I virtually knew nothing about The author is clearly sympathetic to the hardship and struggles of the Burmese people people who had very little before Cyclone Nargis and were left with absolutely nothing afterwards Larkin portrays their military leader, Than Shwe, as a delusioned dictator who lacks any concern for the people of his country I have no doubt that this is the case as I later did a little research into his military regime , but I often felt that the author took liberties than necessary in imagining how Shwe and his top military leaders may have felt or what they did.The book does a very good job at looking into the catastrophe and its aftermath, including the difficulties UN and other aid workers faced in trying to obtain visas or bring much needed supplies into Burma Sprinkled throughout the book were recollections from the people of the small villages in the Irrawaddy Delta region, the area that took the brunt of the storm The author also seemed to have a good grasp of the political history of Burma including Shwe s rise to power Overall, I felt that Everything is Broken was written with a lot of heart and sympathy for the plight of the Burmese people you can almost feel the author s love for this country on every page.

  3. says:

    This could have been so good, and instead was so skin deep Is the author capable of abstract thought Only in the last thirty pages or so does she even try to synthesize what she s pulled together from the propaganda newspaper, rumors in the streets, known recent history, and a few stilted interviews with typhoon survivors.This is a book I could have judged by its cover Everything is Broken struck me as a strange title, literal but available to be a metaphor for something larger Well, it never became anything larger it s a direct quote from a ruined typhoon survivor that the author finally accesses near the end of the book His house and all his possessions were broken in the storm That s it.

  4. says:

    Interesting book about the Burmese Junta which rules the country and Cyclone Nargis which destroyed parts of Burma in May of 2008 The Junta denied aid workers access to the damaged areas and the people who live there Emma Larkin, the author of the book was allowed in on a Tourist visa but many were not The suspicion that aid workers would spread their ideas about democracy and allow information about the world outside Burma to be disseminated was too great and the death of many countrymen and women too unimportant A lesson in catastrophe and aid workers when totalitarian regimes refused to allow help into a country Sad.

  5. says:

    This book is as throughly researched as one could hope of a book about current events in Burma, but frankly, I was disappointed The writing was good enough, but in the end it was my personal interest in Burma that got me through the book It wasn t multi dimensional and gripping like I remember Finding George Orwell in Burma to be It s just reportage with a little poetry And the stories are quite grim and graphic.Interesting, but definitely not essential reading.

  6. says:

    In 2008, Burma was hit by one of the largest cyclones which ever hit it The delta area was swept away by the cyclone, and many people underwent certain hardships Reacting on the disaster, many international institutions and countries sent aids and supports However, the strangest of them would be the military government of Burma Under the name of State Peace and Development Council, the military ruled Burma with iron fist, squashing dissenting voices while making dubious and mostly inept decisions These characteristics were seen in their handling of the crisis Riddled with paranoia, the international aid worker were restricted and hindered Further, their especially General Than Shwe, the true leader of the Junta beliefs on superstitions made the actions taken by them all the erratic These troublesome time made worse by the government decision to cut subsidies on fuels, an action which annoyed the monks and made them fueled one the greatest political uprising since 1988, which sadly, was quashed with chilling ruthlessness and efficiency.In this book, the writer travelled around Burma and reported very well on the hardships and sufferings endured by ordinary Burmese The strangeness of Military also an interesting thing to be expected from this book.

  7. says:

    Extremely well writen, researched and told in a way which transports you to Burma Mynamar I would liken Burma to North Korea in how the militery government shows no compassion for its people and there is a total dictatorship I came away realizing then ever about how many people suffer in this world, how are speachless and powerless they are Someone once said by simply being born in the United States you have automatically won the lottery How true this is.

  8. says:

    Bad ass reporting does not add up to a book.Emma Larkin a pseudonym has investigated Burma for than a decade by the time this book was written, in 2010 Then, and for the three decades before, the country was ruled by a repressive military junta So the mere fact of her getting into the country and writing about the government s many deficiencies, was an act of courage I have not read her first book, which was about the connections between Burma and George Orwell, and is well regarded.This book is about Burma in the wake of a horrible, deadly cyclone that killed 10s of thousands of people It is a terrible tragedy, and Larkin s insistence on telling the story is a noble and brave one The problem is, there s not much of a story to be told, as she is stymied again and again by lack of information, and is reliant on, instead, passing along rumors and reports of looking at a few digital pictures taken surreptitiously by locals.It is clear that Larkin has a very visual imagination the book opens describing two different maps of Burma, one before the cyclone, one in its immediate aftermath, for example but the book has no pictures, partly for obvious reasons, partly for unclear ones The maps could have been reproduced, surely And her prose is not good enough to describe what she sees in a compelling way the first part felt like drudgery As did many other episodes.There are a number of loose ends in the book expected, I guess but these accumulate so that the entire book feels like loose ends, clues never followed It is possible to do this artfully, to show how the junta disconnected people from their identities, from reality, but Larkin does not do this and instead wants to generate outrage, but there is not enough here to do that I mean, the junta was horrible, no doubt, but the book hardly makes the case At about the same time, the Bush administration, for example, fucked up in the same ways regarding Hurricane Katrina That s not because the U.S is a ruled by a ruthless military junta not yet , but garden variety incompetence.I realize that I am critiquing Larkin for not writing the book I wanted to read And she s the one who put her life and freedom on the line, doing her reporting, while I m sitting safely on my ass Fair enough But the book still doesn t convince, persuade, or enrage It is altogether too disconnected, all the action happening at two degrees of remove.And there are other weirdnesses, some caused by history, some by her own choices She ridicules a vote that was being held immediately after the cyclone hit as political theatre But that vote set the stage for the junta retiring and a new political era starting in the country, one led by a long time adversary of the regime I do not think the junta is really caving in, and the new leaders has proven to be ridiculously biased against Muslims Likely, it s just a case of the military consolidating its power, moving into the background, and continuing to reap the benefits of years of rule without being the country s face Think of the changes in China over the last two decades for a model But, it s still the case that the vote was than empty political posturing.There s also a tic of treating some of the many ethnic groups that make up Burma as somehow un Burmese She talks about how the country was at war with these groups, as though they were somehow not also the country Maybe it s just an awkward phrase, but it does appear odd given the difficulties of ethnic integration in the country, and makes one wonder about who Larkin is, and what her allegiances are Again, that could have been explored in the book Instead, it s just one way everything here feels distant and unclear.

  9. says:

    Ocena tej ksi ki jest problematyczna Owszem, dowiedzia em si z niej wiele na temat Birmy, kt ra intryguje mnie podobnie jak Malezja, Chiny i Indonezja najbardziej, je li chodzi o azjatyckie kraje Styl pisania Larkin, czy te mo e t umaczenie pozostawia wiele do yczenia Autorka nie zrobi a researchu, je li chodzi o buddyzm Nie ma u nas czego takiego jak bycie wcieleniem Buddy, bo nie ma to sensu S przypowie ci o cz owieku, kt ry zapocz tkowa t filozofi , ale budda to symbol bycia lepsz wersj siebie aden mnich ani praktykuj cy buddysta nie mo e by reinkarnarcj samego siebie Niekt rzy przyw dcy duchowi jak Dalai Lama w buddyzmie tybeta skim, czy trungpowie czuj si reinkarnacj poprzednich przyw dc w i jest to nawet cz sto wyznacznik bycia kolejnym z nich Po takich uproszczeniach ludzie potem maj mylne wyobra enie buddyzmu Drugi ra cy b d to by mo e kwestie t umaczenia Chodzi mianowicie o opowie o duchownym, kt ry przechodzi na wegetarianizm, by jeszcze bardziej celebrowa drog ku buddyjskiemu o wieceniu Kto nakrywa go na jedzeniu jajka Niemal zacytuje ,,wysz o, e nie jest wegetarianinem wszak e jajko to produkt zwierz cy Jajko jest wegetaria skie Chodzi o weganizm Ale mo e si czepiam, zrzu my to na karb wiekowej opowie ci, jednak mo e jakie doprecyzowanie, by si przyda o Mam wra enie, e autorka zmarnowa a potencja tematu Og lne informacje mog am przeczyta w internecie i nie traci tyle czasu Zero struktury, prawie brak podsumowania jest co na kszta t noty ko cowej od wydawcy, kt ra jest napisana gorzej ni sama ksi ka Plus za ch opowiedzenia historii ludzi, kt rym dyktatura zamyka a usta i za to, e mimo mojego narzekania sporo sie dowiedzia em.

  10. says:

    Excellent on the ground storytelling related not only to Cyclone Nargis but to the chilling political context of the disaster, the recent history of Myanmar Burma, and dark predictions for the future From the current perspective several years after publication, this book captures a sharp final glance at the government and military of Myanmar in its last displays of power preceeding the current democratic experiment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *